From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
Date: | 2022-02-21 16:52:28 |
Message-ID: | 20220221165228.aqnfg45mceym7njm@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-10-13 13:54:10 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I added a --tap option for TAP output to pg_regress together with Jinbao Chen
> for giggles and killing some time a while back.
Sorry for not replying to this earlier. I somehow thought I had, but the
archives disagree.
I think this would be great.
> If it's helpful and there's any interest for this I'm happy to finish it up now.
Yes! Probably worth starting a new thread for...
> One thing that came out of this, is that we don't really handle the ignored
> tests in the way the code thinks it does for normal output, the attached treats
> ignored tests as SKIP tests.
I can't really parse the first sentence...
> if (exit_status != 0)
> log_child_failure(exit_status);
> @@ -2152,6 +2413,7 @@ regression_main(int argc, char *argv[],
> {"config-auth", required_argument, NULL, 24},
> {"max-concurrent-tests", required_argument, NULL, 25},
> {"make-testtablespace-dir", no_argument, NULL, 26},
> + {"tap", no_argument, NULL, 27},
> {NULL, 0, NULL, 0}
> };
I'd make it a --format=(regress|tap) or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2022-02-21 16:59:45 | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2022-02-21 16:49:11 | Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers |