| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? |
| Date: | 2022-01-24 21:28:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20220124212813.hufy7f3ubnzzbk7c@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-01-24 15:35:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-01-14 17:51:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> FWIW, I'm just fine with reverting, particularly in the back branches.
> >> It seems clear that this dank corner of Windows contains even more
> >> creepy-crawlies than we thought.
>
> > Seems we should revert now-ish? There's a minor release coming up and I think
> > it'd be bad to ship these changes to users.
>
> Sure. Do we want to revert in HEAD too?
Not sure. I'm also OK with trying to go with Thomas' patch to walreceiver and
try a bit longer to get all this working. Thomas?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2022-01-24 21:28:43 | Re: Bug in ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo for snapshots crossing 4B, breaking replicas |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Koval | 2022-01-24 21:23:38 | Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations |