On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:24:02PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.01.22 14:51, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Is that change intended? There isn't any usage of the collversionstr before
> > the possible error when actual_versionstr is missing.
>
> I wanted to move it closer to the SysCacheGetAttr() where the "datum" value
> is obtained. It seemed weird to get the datum, then do other things, then
> decode the datum.
Oh ok. It won't make much difference performance-wise, so no objection.