Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2022-01-18 17:44:13
Message-ID: 20220118174413.xwreiv2yr74vdq4v@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-01-18 11:20:08 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Sure, very doable, although we will still need some special logic for
> src/test - there are security implication from running the ssl, ldap and
> kerberos tests by default. See its Makefile.

ISTM that we should move the PG_TEST_EXTRA handling into the tests. Then we'd
not need to duplicate them in the make / msvc world and we'd see them as
skipped tests when not enabled.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-01-18 17:49:16 Re: slowest tap tests - split or accelerate?
Previous Message Sadhuprasad Patro 2022-01-18 17:14:10 Re: Per-table storage parameters for TableAM/IndexAM extensions