Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2022-01-14 23:34:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-01-13 15:27:40 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I can probably adjust to whatever we decide to do. But I think we're
> really just tinkering at the edges here. What I think we really need is
> the moral equivalent of `make check-world` in one invocation of

I agree strongly that we need that. But I think a good chunk of Justin's
changes are actually required to get there?

Specifically, unless we want lots of duplicated logic in, we
need to make vcregress know how to run NO_INSTALLCHECK test. The option added
was just so the buildfarm doesn't start to run tests multiple times...


Andres Freund

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-01-14 23:49:47 Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Previous Message Sergey Shinderuk 2022-01-14 23:15:25 Re: Windows: Wrong error message at connection termination