Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2021-12-13 23:45:23
Message-ID: 20211213234523.uckfzrv6zqok3hjr@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-12-13 18:14:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2021-12-13 16:02:50 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> sudo is used exactly twice; maybe it's not needed at all ?
>
> > The macos one is needed, but the freebsd one indeed isn't.
>
> I'm with Justin on this one. I would view a script trying to
> mess with /cores as a hostile act. PG cores on macOS tend to
> be extremely large and can fill up your disk fairly quickly
> if you don't know they're being accumulated. I think it's okay
> to suggest in the documentation that people might want to allow
> cores to be dropped, but the script has NO business trying to
> force that.

I'm not quite following. This is a ephemeral CI instance?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-12-14 01:31:45 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-12-13 23:14:52 Re: Adding CI to our tree