Re: pg_waldump stucks with options --follow or -f and --stats or -z

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_waldump stucks with options --follow or -f and --stats or -z
Date: 2021-11-17 18:35:03
Message-ID: 202111171835.pjvr7wgehjxr@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Nov-17, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:49 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > At the same time, we could also just let things as they are. --follow
> > and --stats being specified together is what the user looked for, so
> > they get what they wanted.
>
> I think the existing way of pg_waldump getting stuck with the
> combination of options "-s/-f/-z" and "-s/-e/-f/-z" doesn't look good
> for an end user.

I agree that it's not right, but I don't think the solution is to ban
the combination. I think what we should do is change the behavior to
make the combination potentially useful, so that it waits until program
termination and print the summary then. Consider "strace -c" as a
precedent: it will also "become stuck" until you kill it, and then it'll
print a nice table, just like the pg_waldump -z gives you.

I think I would even have had occasion to use this as a feature in the
past ...

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Brindle 2021-11-17 18:42:23 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-11-17 18:25:50 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners