Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: 2021-05-18 15:09:48
Message-ID: 20210518150948.GC30270@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:51:00AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> > backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> > The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> > "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> > "make the GUC do nothing" commit).
>
> I suppose that's true -- maybe it should be listed separately, because
> the GUC is removed in 14 only.

OK, this is a mess then. Would someone please give me the full text for
this, including the commit hash(es)? Is the PG 13.3 release note text
accurate?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-05-18 15:23:02 Re: Multiple pg_waldump --rmgr options
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-18 15:08:15 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft