From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Date: | 2021-05-18 15:09:48 |
Message-ID: | 20210518150948.GC30270@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:51:00AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> > backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> > The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> > "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> > "make the GUC do nothing" commit).
>
> I suppose that's true -- maybe it should be listed separately, because
> the GUC is removed in 14 only.
OK, this is a mess then. Would someone please give me the full text for
this, including the commit hash(es)? Is the PG 13.3 release note text
accurate?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-05-18 15:23:02 | Re: Multiple pg_waldump --rmgr options |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-05-18 15:08:15 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |