| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2021-05-13 17:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20210513175107.GF20766@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:33:27PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'm coming around to have a similar feeling. While having an
> > alternative query ID might be useful, I have a hard time seeing it as
> > likely to be a hugely popular feature that is worth a lot of users
> > complaining (as we've seen already, multiple times, before even getting
> > to beta...) that things aren't working anymore. That we can't figure
> > out which libraries to load automatically based on what extensions have
> > been installed and therefore make everyone have to change
> > shared_preload_libraries isn't a good thing and requiring additional
> > configuration for extremely common extensions like pg_stat_statements is
> > making it worse.
>
> Would someone please explain what is wrong with what is in the tree
> now, except that it needs additional warnings about misconfiguration?
> Requiring two postgresql.conf changes instead of one doesn't seem like a
> valid complaint to me, especially if the warnings are in place and the
> release notes mention it.
Will you be updating pg_upgrade to detect and throw a warning during
check in the event that it discovers a broken config?
If not, then I don't think you're correct in arguing that this need for
additional configuration isn't a valid complaint.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-05-13 17:54:55 | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-05-13 17:41:27 | Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers |