From: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions |
Date: | 2021-04-07 18:07:41 |
Message-ID: | 20210407200741.4a502e2a@firost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:36:31 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2021-Apr-07, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>
> > Yes, it would be much saner to make PostgresNode the factory class. Plus,
> > some more logic could be injected there to either auto-detect the version
> > (current behavior) or eg. use a given path to the binaries as Mark did in
> > its patch.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean about auto-detecting the version -- I assume
> we would auto-detect the version by calling pg_config from the
> configured path and parsing the binary, which is what Mark's patch is
> supposed to do already. So I don't see what the distinction between
> those two things is.
My version is currently calling pg_config without any knowledge about its
absolute path.
Mark's patch is able to take an explicit binary path:
my $a = PostgresNode->get_new_node('a', install_path => '/my/install/8.4');
> In order to avoid having an ever-growing plethora of 100-byte .pm files,
> we can put the version-specific classes in the same PostgresNode.pm
> file, at the bottom, "class PostgresNode96; use parent PostgresNode10;"
> followed by the routines that are overridden for each version.
Sure.
> > Let me know if it worth that I work on an official patch.
>
> Let's give it a try ...
OK
Regards,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-04-07 18:12:11 | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-04-07 18:02:16 | Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans |