Re: libpq debug log

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com, iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com, k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
Date: 2021-02-09 10:51:22
Message-ID: 20210209105122.GA30281@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Feb-09, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:

> This looks like a fusion of PQtrace and PQtraceEX. By the way, the
> timestamp flag is needed at log emittion. So we can change the state
> anytime.
>
> PQtrace(conn, of);
> PQtraceSetFlags(conn, PQTRACE_SUPPRESS_TIMESTAMPS);

I like this idea better than PQtraceEx().

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-02-09 11:11:59 Re: pg_replication_origin_drop API potential race condition
Previous Message 'Alvaro Herrera' 2021-02-09 10:47:43 Re: libpq debug log