Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date: 2020-11-19 16:17:16
Message-ID: 20201119161716.GA14861@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:15:33AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 11/19/20 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Let's just rip it out and be done. If anyone is ever
> > motivated to make it work per spec, they can resurrect
> > whatever seems useful from the git history.
>
> +1

+1

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-11-19 16:35:19 Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data
Previous Message Joe Conway 2020-11-19 16:15:33 Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?