| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt |
| Date: | 2020-09-18 22:42:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20200918224224.GD30016@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that not so much people know about
> pgxn.org
> Before writing this mail I have tried to locate such resource in Google and
> didn't succeed.
>
> yes, It is not strongly joined with the Postgres community, and it doesn't
> deploy binary (compiled) code if I know it. So for some people it is not
> usable.
>
> But anytime this and similar repositories will have problems, because the
> extensions there are not reviewed, nobody did security check, nobody did QA.
>
> This is useful for Postgres developers, for very advanced users, or for very
> fearless users :).
I think if PGXN had more must-have extensions, its popularity would
increase.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-18 23:32:01 | Re: pg_service.conf file with unknown parameters |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-18 22:38:45 | Re: Proposals for making it easier to write correct bgworkers |