Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2020-09-17 07:41:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:23:34AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Adding a <productname> markup around OpenSSL in the docs makes things
> consistent. +1.

I have looked at 0001, and applied it after fixing the line length
(thanks for not doing it to ease my lookup), and I found one extra
place in need of fix. Patch 0002 is failing to apply.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 07:45:56 Re: BUG #15858: could not stat file - over 4GB
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-09-17 07:35:58 Re: Report error position in partition bound check