| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |
| Date: | 2020-09-04 01:23:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20200904012334.GF19499@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:26:03PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The 0001 patch isn't strictly necessary but it seems reasonable to address the
>> various ways OpenSSL was spelled out in the docs while at updating the SSL
>> portions. It essentially ensures that markup around OpenSSL and SSL is used
>> consistently. I didn't address the linelengths being too long in this patch to
>> make review easier instead.
>
> I'll take a look.
Adding a <productname> markup around OpenSSL in the docs makes things
consistent. +1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-04 01:25:22 | Re: [NBTREE] Possible NULL pointer dereference (backend/access/nbtree/nbutils.c) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-09-04 01:21:49 | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |