Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date: 2020-09-17 05:09:20
Message-ID: 20200917050920.GL2873@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:13:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Josef, the patch has been waiting on author for a bit more than one
> month, so could you send a rebased version please? It looks that you
> are still a bit confused by the commit fest process, and as a first
> step we need a clean version to be able to review it. This would also
> allow the commit fest bot to check it at http://commitfest.cputube.org/.

This feature has some appeal, but there is no activity lately, so I am
marking it as returned with feedback. Please feel free to send a new
patch once you have time to do so, and I would recommend to register a
new entry in the commit fest app when done.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 05:25:19 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-17 05:07:11 Re: Built-in connection pooler