Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date: 2020-09-07 04:13:10
Message-ID: 20200907041310.GA3762@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:51:36AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Yeah, since I read this message, I was thinking that new patch will be
> posted. But, Josef, if the situation was changed, could you correct me?
> Anyway the patch seems not to be applied cleanly, so at least it needs to
> be updated to address that.

Josef, the patch has been waiting on author for a bit more than one
month, so could you send a rebased version please? It looks that you
are still a bit confused by the commit fest process, and as a first
step we need a clean version to be able to review it. This would also
allow the commit fest bot to check it at http://commitfest.cputube.org/.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-07 04:33:03 Re: v13: CLUSTER segv with wal_level=minimal and parallel index creation
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-09-07 03:46:57 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch