Re: v13: show extended stats target in \d

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: v13: show extended stats target in \d
Date: 2020-09-09 21:36:27
Message-ID: 20200909213627.GW18552@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:35:19PM +0000, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
> I will humbly disagree with the current review. I shall refrain from changing the status though because I do not have very strong feeling about it.

Sorry but this was in my spam, and didn't see until now.

>
> However the patch contains:
>
> - " 'm' = any(stxkind) AS mcv_enabled\n"
> + " 'm' = any(stxkind) AS mcv_enabled,\n"
> + " %s"
> "FROM pg_catalog.pg_statistic_ext stat "
> "WHERE stxrelid = '%s'\n"
> "ORDER BY 1;",
> + (pset.sversion >= 130000 ? "stxstattarget\n" : "-1\n"),
> oid);
>
> This seems to be breaking a bit the pattern in describeOneTableDetails().
> First, it is customary to write the whole query for the version in its own block. I do find this pattern rather helpful and clean. So in my humble opinion, the ternary expression should be replaced with a distinct if block that would implement stxstattarget. Second, setting the value to -1 as an indication of absence breaks the pattern a bit further. More on that bellow.

Hm, I did like this using the "hastriggers" code as a template. But you're
right that everywhere else does it differently.

> + if (strcmp(PQgetvalue(result, i, 8), "-1") != 0)
> + appendPQExpBuffer(&buf, " STATISTICS %s",
> + PQgetvalue(result, i, 8));
> +
>
> In the same function, one will find a bit of a different pattern for printing the statistics, e.g.
> if (strcmp(PQgetvalue(result, i, 7), "t") == 0)
> I will again hold the opinion that if the query gets crafted a bit differently, one can inspect if the table has `stxstattarget` and then, go ahead and print the value.
>
> Something in the lines of:
> if (strcmp(PQgetvalue(result, i, 8), "t") == 0)
> appendPQExpBuffer(&buf, " STATISTICS %s", PQgetvalue(result, i, 9));

I think what you've written wouldn't give the desired behavior, since it would
show the stats target even when it's set to the default. I don't see the point
of having additional, separate, version-specific boolean columns for 1) column
exists; 2) column is not default, in addition to 3) column value. But I added
comment about what Peter and I agree is desirable, anyway.

> Finally, the patch might be more complete if a note is added in the documentation.
> Have you considered adding something in doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml? If no, will you consider it? If yes, why did you discard it?

I don't think the details of psql output are currently documented. This shows
nothing about column statistics target, nor about MV stats at all.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/app-psql.html

As for the discussion about a separator, I think maybe a comma is enough. I
doubt anyone is going to think that you can get a valid command by prefixing
this by "CREATE STATISTICS". Actually, it didn't even occur to me it was valid
command without the stats target - after all, that's not true of indexes.

+ "public"."ab1_a_b_stats" (ndistinct, dependencies, mcv) ON a, b FROM ab1, STATISTICS 0

This revision only shows the stats target in verbose mode (slash dee plus).

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Show-stats-target-of-extended-statistics.patch text/x-diff 4.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-09 22:00:41 Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-09-09 21:06:54 Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux