Re: Parallel copy

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Date: 2020-08-04 16:21:44
Message-ID: 20200804162144.djylr3agyoq2usfs@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:33:48PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:55 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The patches were not applying because of the recent commits.
>> I have rebased the patch over head & attached.
>I rebased v2-0006-Parallel-Copy-For-Binary-Format-Files.patch.
>Putting together all the patches rebased on to the latest commit
>b8fdee7d0ca8bd2165d46fb1468f75571b706a01. Patches from 0001 to 0005
>are rebased by Vignesh, that are from the previous mail and the patch
>0006 is rebased by me.
>Please consider this patch set for further review.

I'd suggest incrementing the version every time an updated version is
submitted, even if it's just a rebased version. It makes it clearer
which version of the code is being discussed, etc.


Tomas Vondra
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2020-08-04 16:32:57 Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2020-08-04 16:19:27 Re: Error on failed COMMIT