From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view |
Date: | 2020-07-01 15:14:21 |
Message-ID: | 20200701151421.GA8125@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jul-01, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Okay, but do we think it is better to display this in
> pg_replication_slots or some new view like pg_stat_*_slots as being
> discussed in [1]? It should not happen that we later decide to move
> this or similar stats to that view.
It seems that the main motivation for having some counters in another
view is the ability to reset them; and resetting this distance value
makes no sense, so I think it's better to have it in
pg_replication_slots.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-07-01 15:30:12 | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-07-01 15:03:03 | Re: Collation versioning |