Re: Failures with installcheck and low work_mem value in 13~

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Failures with installcheck and low work_mem value in 13~
Date: 2020-06-26 01:03:13
Message-ID: 20200626010313.GC1504@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:15:54PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The RMT met today. We determined that it wasn't worth adjusting this
> test to pass with non-standard work_mem values.

Okay, thanks for the feedback. We'll see how it works out.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-06-26 01:21:53 Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-06-26 00:59:30 Re: Missing some ifndef FRONTEND at the top of logging.c and file_utils.c