| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org, davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie |
| Subject: | Re: SIGSEGV from START_REPLICATION 0/XXXXXXX in XLogSendPhysical () at walsender.c:2762 |
| Date: | 2020-06-24 14:58:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20200624145808.GA18120@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jun-24, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> In logical replication, a replication role is intended to be
> accessible only to the GRANTed databases. On the other hand the same
> role can create a dead copy of the whole cluster, including
> non-granted databases.
In other words -- essentially, if you grant replication access to a role
only to a specific database, they can steal the whole cluster.
I don't see what's so great about that, but apparently people like it.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-24 14:58:47 | Re: Assertion failure in pg_copy_logical_replication_slot() |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-06-24 14:27:41 | Re: [PATCH] COPY command's data format option allows only lowercase csv, text or binary |