| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Arthur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL |
| Date: | 2020-06-08 16:31:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20200608163126.GA27318@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jun-08, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> In this version I rebased test patches, added some more comments, fixed
> memory allocation issue and also removed code that handles ACLs on
> languages. They require a lot of specific handling, while I doubt that their
> signatures, which consist of language name only, are subject to change in
> any future versions.
I'm thinking what's a good way to have a test that's committable. Maybe
it would work to add a TAP test to pg_upgrade that runs initdb, does a
few GRANTS as per your attachment, then runs pg_upgrade? Currently the
pg_upgrade tests are not TAP ... we'd have to revive
https://postgr.es/m/20180126080026.GI17847@paquier.xyz
(Some progress was already made on the buildfarm front to permit this)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-08 16:39:32 | Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-08 16:21:44 | Re: should CREATE INDEX ON partitioned_table call PreventInTransactionBlock() ? |