Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c
Date: 2020-06-03 12:38:42
Message-ID: 20200603123842.GL89559@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I don't have a problem with the existing wording of the first sentence, and I
> don't have a problem with your suggestion either (as long as it's parameters in
> plural).

Thanks, that's why I kept the word plural in my own suggestion. I was
just reading through the whole set again, and still kind of prefer the
last flavor, so I think that I'll just fix it this way tomorrow and
call it a day.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-06-03 12:40:54 Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c
Previous Message 李杰 (慎追) 2020-06-03 12:22:29 how to create index concurrently on paritioned table