Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Date: 2020-05-18 23:44:59
Message-ID: 20200518234459.GA1850@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

BTW while you're messing with checkpointer, I propose this patch to
simplify things.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-CreateCheckPoint-return-bool.patch text/x-diff 2.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-19 02:03:13 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-05-18 23:30:32 Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES