Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
Date: 2020-05-18 23:30:32
Message-ID: 20200518233032.GA32205@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-May-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:
>
> > The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
> > absent (implying 1).
> >
> > We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.
>
> Oops, yes. I added a test. Will get this pushed immediately after I
> see beta1 produced.

Done. Thanks!

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-05-18 23:44:59 Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-05-18 22:14:36 Re: POC: rational number type (fractions)