Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-05-05 18:45:37
Message-ID: 20200505184537.GC28974@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > | This is controlled by GUC wal_skip_threshold.
> > > > I think you should say that's a size threshold which determines which strategy
> > > > to use (WAL or fsync).
> > >
> > > I went with:
> > > The WAL write amount where this happens is controlled by wal_skip_threshold.
> > >
> > > They can use the doc link if they want more detail.
> >
> > I guess I would say "relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will be fsynced
> > rather than copied to WAL"
>
> How is this?
>
> Relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will have their files fynsced
> rather than writing their WAL records.

I see I was too late, but:

Fix typo (fynsc) and maybe add parens().

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-05-05 18:48:58 Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2020-05-05 18:44:33 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft