Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery

From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Date: 2020-04-22 16:17:17
Message-ID: 20200422181717.491fb499@firost
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:58:24 +0200
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:32:23 +0900
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
>
> This test seems useless to me. It should either be removed or patched to test
> the signal has been removed after a second restartpoint.
>
> Please, find in attachment a patch for 9.6 implementing this. If it seems
> reasonable to you, I can create the backpatch to 9.5.

I found an extra useless line of code in v9 patch. Please, find in
attachment v10. Sorry for this.

Regards,

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-v10-Fix-WAL-retention-during-production-crash-recovery.patch text/x-patch 16.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2020-04-22 17:54:06 Re: BUG #16354: No geos 3.8.1 package for RHEL 8
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-04-22 15:58:24 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-04-22 16:20:52 Re: design for parallel backup
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-04-22 16:12:32 Re: design for parallel backup