Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependency statistics use

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependency statistics use
Date: 2020-03-29 15:27:36
Message-ID: 20200329152736.3c3m4geltlbepvmh@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 13:18, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I've pushed that with your recommendation for that function name.
>>
>
>Does this now complete everything that you wanted to do for functional
>dependency stats for PG13? Re-reading the thread, I couldn't see
>anything else that needed looking at. If that's the case, the CF entry
>can be closed.
>

Yes. There were two improvements proposed, we've committed one of them
(the IN/ANY operator handling) and the other (containment) needs more
discussion. So I think it's OK to mark this either as committed or maybe
returned with feedback.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-03-29 15:31:05 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Matheus de Oliveira 2020-03-29 14:39:25 Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT