| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest manager for 2020-03 |
| Date: | 2020-02-27 02:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20200227023942.GE1969@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:34:26PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Nope, the RMT for PG12 was announced on 2019/03/30 [1], i.e. shortly
> before the end of the last CF (and before pgcon). I think there was some
> discussion about the members at/after the FOSDEM dev meeting. The
> overlap with CFM duties is still fairly minimal, and there's not much
> for RMT to do before the end of the last CF anyway ...
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190330094043.GA28827@paquier.xyz
>
> Maybe we shouldn't wait with assembling RMT until pgcon, though.
Waiting until PGCon if a bad idea, because we need to decide the
feature freeze deadline after the last CF, and this decision is taken
mainly by the RMT. I think that it is also good to begin categorizing
open items and handle them when reported.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hubert Zhang | 2020-02-27 03:01:27 | Re: Yet another vectorized engine |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-02-27 02:37:02 | Re: Commit fest manager for 2020-03 |