Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF
Date: 2020-01-21 15:25:14
Message-ID: 20200121152514.GA17983@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jan-21, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> About half of the WoA patches are inactive for a long time, i.e. have
> been marked like that before 2020-01 (and sometimes long before that)
> and there have been no substantive updates. The chance of that changing
> (i.e. getting a new patch version and a meaningful review) in the last
> couple of days of the CF seem slim, and there's plenty of patches that
> are being actively discussed, so I plan to start moving those inactive
> patches to 2020-03 over the weekend/early next week.

In the previous commitfest that I ran, I closed as returned-with-feedback
any patches that were waiting-on-author and had not changed for a very
long time. My rationale was that preserving those dead entries serves
no useful purpose. If the author or somebody else wants to move the
patch forward, they can post a new version now, or submit a new CF entry
later. We don't need zombies.

I did provide a list of such patches, so that any interested onlookers
can act.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-01-21 16:09:42 Re: Index Skip Scan
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-01-21 15:23:59 Re: Increase psql's password buffer size