Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nino Floris <mail(at)ninofloris(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support
Date: 2020-01-16 22:00:12
Message-ID: 20200116220012.h5sjb5e3czbrwjah@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:29:03AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Nino Floris wrote:
>> Alright, as usual life got in the way. I've attached a new version of
>> the patch with pgindent changes.
>> > What do you think about writing patch for ALTER TYPE?
>> I'd rather not :$
>> > 1) Write migration script, which directly updates pg_type.
>> This sounds like the best option right now, if we don't want people to
>> do manual migrations to ltree 1.2.
>> How would I best go at this?
>> > Travis has a small complaint:
>> Should be fixed!
>The latest patch provided fails to apply for me on HEAD. Please
>provide a rebase. For now I am bumping this patch to next CF with
>"waiting on author" as status.

Nino, any plans to submit a rebased/fixed patch, so that people can
review it? Not sure if this needs a simple rebase or something more
complex, all I know is cputube can't apply it.


Tomas Vondra
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-16 22:05:30 Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-16 21:57:30 Re: row filtering for logical replication