Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, movead li <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2020-01-16 21:57:30
Message-ID: 20200116215730.vq6ark7uycmvwxtx@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:32:01AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:48:29AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:38 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Needed to be rebased, which I did, to be able to test them; patches attached.
>> Oops, really attached this time.
>Euler, this thread is waiting for input from you regarding the latest
>comments from Amit.

Euler, this patch is still in "waiting on author" since 11/25. Do you
plan to review changes made by Amit in the patches he submitted, or what
are your plans with this patch?


Tomas Vondra
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-16 22:00:12 Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-16 21:45:25 Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable