Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?
Date: 2020-01-11 02:01:33
Message-ID: 20200111020133.yhu3fjgw5wwh4cdd@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I wonder what is the status of this patch/thread. There was quite a bit
of discussion about possible approaches, but we currently don't have any
patch for review, AFAICS. Not sure what's the plan?

So "needs review" status seems wrong, and considering we haven't seen
any patch since August (so in the past two CFs) I propose marking it as
returned with feedback. Any objections?

FWIW I think we may well need a more elaborate logic which paths to
keep, but I'd prefer re-adding it back to the CF when we actually have a
new patch.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-01-11 02:34:40 Re: Disallow cancellation of waiting for synchronous replication
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-11 01:52:53 Re: Add FOREIGN to ALTER TABLE in pg_dump