Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw
Date: 2019-12-25 02:25:54
Message-ID: 20191225022554.GE3448@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:17:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, it's sort of annoying that the buildfarm didn't notice this
> aspect of things. I'm not sure I want to spend cycles on checking
> it in every test run, though.
>
> Maybe we could have -DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS
> enable a check for that aspect along with what it does now?

Makes sense to restrict that under the flag. Perhaps a catalog scan
of pg_authid at the end of pg_regress and isolationtester then?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-12-25 06:17:22 Re: pgsql: Fix compiler warning for ppoll() on Cygwin
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-25 01:25:49 pgsql: Rename files and headers related to index AM

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-25 02:31:27 Re: Server crash with Master-Slave configuration.
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-12-25 02:23:50 Re: Online checksums verification in the backend