Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.
Date: 2019-11-13 04:53:24
Message-ID: 20191113045324.GR1549@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:35:03AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Indeed, thanks for looking. I thought that the callback was called
> after checking for max_prepared_transaction, but that's not the case.
> So let's add at least a test case. Any objections?

Okay, done.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Mercha 2019-11-13 05:09:31 SPI error with non-volatile functions
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-11-13 04:32:13 Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)