Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.
Date: 2019-11-12 00:35:03
Message-ID: 20191112003503.GA1549@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:43:18PM +0100, Gilles Darold wrote:
> Hi Michael, it looks that a separate test is not required at least for
> this test. Here is a patch that enable the test in
> contrib/postgres_fdw/, expected output:

Indeed, thanks for looking. I thought that the callback was called
after checking for max_prepared_transaction, but that's not the case.
So let's add at least a test case. Any objections?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2019-11-12 01:03:40 Re: Ordering of header file inclusion
Previous Message Nikita Glukhov 2019-11-12 00:09:42 Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE