Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Date: 2019-11-11 16:55:59
Message-ID: 20191111165559.GA18684@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Nov-11, Dave Cramer wrote:

> Previously someone mentioned that we need to confirm whether the two
> servers are compatible for binary or not.
>
> Checking to make sure the two servers have the same endianness is obvious.
> Sizeof int, long, float, double, timestamp (float/int) at a minimum.
>
> this could be done in libpqrcv_startstreaming. The question I have
> remaining is do we fall back to text mode if needed or simply fail ?

I think it makes more sense to have it fail. If the user wants to retry
in text mode, they can do that easily enough; but if we make it
fall-back automatically and they set up the received wrongly by mistake,
they would pay the performance penalty without noticing.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-11-11 17:07:20 Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-11-11 16:53:40 Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal