| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | juha-pekka(dot)eloranta(at)reaktor(dot)fi, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication |
| Date: | 2019-10-07 22:06:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20191007220642.GB8554@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> > fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> > syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> > than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
>
> Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch. I
> also clarified the asynchronous case.
Patch applied thorough all current versions of the Postgres docs.
Thanks for the report.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2019-10-08 08:58:19 | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-10-07 21:27:10 | Re: Ambiguous language in Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs [EXT] |