| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | juha-pekka(dot)eloranta(at)reaktor(dot)fi, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous Multimaster Replication |
| Date: | 2019-09-28 13:47:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20190928134740.GB26853@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:37:18PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/different-replication-solutions.html
> Description:
>
> Not sure if this is an error but I was wondering about this sentence: "In
> fact, write performance is often worse than that of a single server". Isn't
> syncronous multimaster write performance always (rather than "often") worse
> than that of a single (non-distributed) server?
Very good point. I have improved the text with the attached patch. I
also clarified the asynchronous case.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| sync.diff | text/x-diff | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-09-28 20:31:09 | Re: Fix contributor name-related inconsistencies in release-12.sgml |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-09-27 17:13:32 | Re: Please add example |