From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong |
Date: | 2019-09-26 07:00:12 |
Message-ID: | 20190926070012.GC2448@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:12:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It's not clear to me what the next action should be on this patch. I
> think Jeff got some feedback from Tom, but was that enough to expect a
> new version to be posted? That was in February; should we now (in late
> September) close this as Returned with Feedback?
That sounds rather right to me.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-09-26 07:05:23 | Re: Global temporary tables |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-26 06:56:46 | Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joao Junior | 2019-09-26 07:54:40 | Analyze on slave promoted. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-25 20:12:26 | Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong |