| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong |
| Date: | 2019-09-25 20:12:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
It's not clear to me what the next action should be on this patch. I
think Jeff got some feedback from Tom, but was that enough to expect a
new version to be posted? That was in February; should we now (in late
September) close this as Returned with Feedback?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-25 20:14:04 | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-25 20:07:48 | Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-26 07:00:12 | Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-09-25 19:23:23 | Re: sequence depends on many tables |