| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MSVC buildfarm critters are not running modules' TAP tests |
| Date: | 2019-09-11 02:11:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20190911021135.GB1953@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:43:06AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:44:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The whole thing should be back-patched into branches that have
>> any affected tests. (But, please, not till after beta4 is
>> tagged.)
>
> Sure. Don't worry about that. I am focused on another thing lately
> and it does not touch back-branches.
As the cease-fire period is over, I have committed the part for glob()
and backpatched down to 9.4. The other parts need a closer lookup,
and I would not bother with anything older than v12 as TAP_TESTS has
been added there in pgxs.mk.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2019-09-11 02:11:52 | Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea? |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2019-09-11 02:01:24 | Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea? |