Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
Date: 2019-09-03 18:38:56
Message-ID: 20190903183855.GA20601@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-01, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> I'll move it to the next CF. Aside from the issues pointed by Kyotaro-san
> in his review, I still haven't made my mind about whether to base the use
> statistics targets set for the attributes. That's what we're doing now,
> but I'm not sure it's a good idea after adding separate statistics target.
> I wonder what Dean's opinion on this is, as he added the current logic.

Latest patch no longer applies. Please update. And since you already
seem to have handled all review comments since it was Ready for
Committer, and you now know Dean's opinion on the remaining question,
please get it pushed.

Thanks

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-03 18:42:54 Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-03 18:33:05 Re: \describe*