Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>
Subject: Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Date: 2019-09-03 16:56:15
Message-ID: 20190903165615.GA16727@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-02, Shawn Wang wrote:

> Hi Antonin,
> It is very glad to see the new patch. I used the public patches a long time ago.
> I did some tests like the stream replication, much data running, temporary files encryption.
> I found that there is an issue in the src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. You should put block_size = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_block_size(ctx); under the #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING.
> There is some problem to merge your patches to the latest kernel in the pg_ctl.c.

Is a new, fixed version going to be posted soon? It's been a while.

Also, apologies if this has been asked before, but: how does this patch
relate to the stuff being discussed in
https://postgr.es/m/031401d3f41d$5c70ed90$1552c8b0$@lab.ntt.co.jp ?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ibrar Ahmed 2019-09-03 17:10:56 Re: Proposal: roll pg_stat_statements into core
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-09-03 16:49:11 Re: dropdb --force