From: | Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Antonin Houska" <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Ants Aasma" <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption |
Date: | 2019-09-04 09:23:01 |
Message-ID: | 16cfb959a6e.b5dff325147658.4740169799266484976@highgo.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---- On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:56:15 +0800 Alvaro Herrera <mailto:alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote ----
On 2019-Aug-02, Shawn Wang wrote:
> Hi Antonin,
> It is very glad to see the new patch. I used the public patches a long time ago.
> I did some tests like the stream replication, much data running, temporary files encryption.
> I found that there is an issue in the src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. You should put block_size = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_block_size(ctx); under the #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING.
> There is some problem to merge your patches to the latest kernel in the pg_ctl.c.
Is a new, fixed version going to be posted soon? It's been a while.
Also, apologies if this has been asked before, but: how does this patch
relate to the stuff being discussed in
https://postgr.es/m/031401d3f41d$5c70ed90$1552c8b0$@lab.ntt.co.jp ?
Hi Álvaro,
Thank you for a reply.
I mainly said that the issues in the src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. If somebody want to use these patches, I think Antonin need to fix it.
It does not relate to the stuff being discussed in TDE. As I know, some company use these patches to encrypt data, even if these issues don't matter.
Regards,
--
Shawn Wang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2019-09-04 09:29:13 | Re: pg_get_databasebyid(oid) |
Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2019-09-04 09:22:20 | Re: pglz performance |