Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Date: 2019-08-21 19:16:43
Message-ID: 20190821191643.GA22373@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-21, Melanie Plageman wrote:

> In Greenplum, we mainly add new tests to a separate isolation
> framework (called isolation2) which uses a completely different
> syntax. It doesn't use isolationtester at all. So, I haven't had a use
> case to add long options to isolationtester yet :)

Is that other framework somehow more capable?

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-08-21 19:29:22 Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2019-08-21 18:07:19 Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps