Re: concerns around pg_lsn

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: concerns around pg_lsn
Date: 2019-08-04 06:43:53
Message-ID: 20190804064353.GA1762@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 11:57:01PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Can we please change the macro definition so that have_error is one of
> the arguments? Having the variable be used inside the macro definition
> but not appear literally in the call is quite confusing.

Good idea. This needs some changes only in float.c.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2019-08-04 07:04:01 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-08-04 06:29:25 Re: Problem with default partition pruning