Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
Date: 2019-07-22 19:34:59
Message-ID: 20190722193459.GA14241@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jul-22, Tom Lane wrote:

> I nearly missed the need for that because of all the noise that
> check-world emits in pre-v12 branches. We'd discussed back-patching
> eb9812f27 at the time, and I think now it's tested enough that doing
> so is low risk (or at least, lower risk than the risk of not seeing
> a failure). So I think I'll go do that now.

I'd like that, as it bites me too, thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-22 19:37:47 Re: errbacktrace
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-07-22 19:20:50 Re: initdb recommendations