| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs |
| Date: | 2019-06-25 01:16:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20190625011659.GD5569@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:47:09AM +0200, Dent John wrote:
> I’ll see if I can get the patch applied and feed back on how much it
> move towards making my use case a viable proposition.
There is another patch which provides more coverage for reloptions:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2064/
Based on my last lookup, I was rather unhappy with its shape because
of the assumptions behind the tests and the extra useless work it was
doing with parameter strings (the set of WARNING is also something we
don't need). If we get that first in, we can then make sure that any
extra refactoring has hopefully no impact.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2019-06-25 01:57:58 | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-06-25 01:07:50 | Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw |